vinny b
Member
- Messages
- 333
As above I'm not sure which one to go for next the evo 8 mr fq 400 or a blue evo 9 fq 320 with a 2.2 conversion ??...
Yep, the 400 will hold better value due to it being rare.
I like both but depends what you want. I'd go and drive both and choose the better car![]()
Yeah I'm just after a fast road car the fq400 has a different turbo an fb black I think and a AMS intercooler so it's not a true original i suppose and it's done about 30.000 miles
sorry to be picky here lee mate but....:angel:
the 400 will not drive the same as IX with 2.2 so unless its just a drive test for tightness, knocks and bangs etc its pointless as the power delivery , handling etc will be totally different.
Just go drive them both and then make a decision based on what you want to do with the car....for that kind of cash though id be looking for a mint mak LOL
The 2.2 would be great fun for power etc but the 400 is a rare car that is super cool IMO...I looked for ages at 400's and couldnt find a good one for sale any where I looked.
Is the 400 a red one ?
If so i think i know the car and its been up for sale along time...dont touch it !!!
its been on its roof and rolled the seller is a dodgy one dude :thinking:
Haha no its not red one it's gun metal grey number 51
FP chocolate tubbys going by the reviews over the road mate but the intercooler is quality bit of kit !
but it wouldnt be hard to put a standard tubby back on or buy a new one ....30k is nothing for a evo as long as its got FSH mate.
whats the mileage on the 2.2 ?
Oh right would u not rate the fp turbos then?? The 9 has about the same amount of miles on it and belive it or not it has the standard fq400 turbo on that..
Yeah u say that about the fuel system it's had a bigger intake manifold hks fuel rail and 1000cc Injectors fuel pump and fuel pressure reg aswell he used that turbo because it's one they had on the shelf at the time.. It was done on a hub dyno but like u said with it being a 2.2 I thought it would of pulled a bit more than that...
true true, just doesnt hold torque like a stroker should :thinking:Only 400 ft lbs, a stage one 9 with remap can make very close to that and some do!
I'm sure jonnys torque figures ain't far off this
im guessing thats just a piggyback ecu as aposed to a swapped ecu.And does anybody know about the hks Fcon vpro ecu??