powerstation dyno results

[sponners]

some car lee :disgusted::disgusted:

did you seem my 423.9 bhp result :whistling::whistling::whistling: well happy

im thay happy the drinks are on jonny 1X :whistling::whistling::whistling:

no Geof, you had 297 at the wheels :whistling: :razz:


glad your happy with it mate

 

[evogeof]

no Geof, you had 297 at the wheels :whistling: :razz:


glad your happy with it mate

sod off you

 

[sponners]

I think they use a coast down method.

ok, cheers Ant.


whats your opinion on the drivetrain loss I posted above?

 

[sponners]

sod off you

luv ya really Geof

 

[evogeof]

luv ya really Geof

i know ya do. and a lot of it is down to you matey, all the advice you gave me

 

[stevolution2010]

i dont think that powerstations figures are correct and mine was 1 of the lowest and im not saying that because it was

im saying it because i dont think mine is that high i mean how can it be its pretty much standard as i found out on the day

 

[antony@indigo-gt]

Looking at a few graphs of the big power cars and the lower stuff and there is not a massive difference between the wheel figures but then the flywheel numbers are close to what you would expect.

I think across the entire day the figures they are fairly accurate so although perhaps the method seems strange the results pan out. Geof's car for instance is a 9 running 2 bar so it is about what you would expect and there was a 7 on the day. I think just a remap with 360bhp so again about what is expected.

 

[evogeof]

i dont think that powerstations figures are correct and mine was 1 of the lowest and im not saying that because it was

im saying it because i dont think mine is that high i mean how can it be its pretty much standard as i found out on the day

everyone else woz on the ball with there figures steve.

 

[stevolution2010]

Looking at a few graphs of the big power cars and the lower stuff and there is not a massive difference between the wheel figures but then the flywheel numbers are close to what you would expect.

I think across the entire day the figures they are fairly accurate so although perhaps the method seems strange the results pan out. Geof's car for instance is a 9 running 2 bar so it is about what you would expect and there was a 7 on the day. I think just a remap with 360bhp so again about what is expected.

ah thats good then so i actually have 315bhp then

so with a pump and the dawes device fitted what do u think ill see with a re-map ant?

 

[antony@indigo-gt]

i dont think that powerstations figures are correct and mine was 1 of the lowest and im not saying that because it was

im saying it because i dont think mine is that high i mean how can it be its pretty much standard as i found out on the day

My 6 was 312bhp standard on a dastek rollers just had a filter and decat

 

[stevolution2010]

My 6 was 312bhp standard on a dastek rollers just had a filter and decat

mine has an hks hardpipe from turbo to hks mushroom filter,hks ssqv dump valve,dawes device(from urself):razz: and 3" exhaust but not de-catted oh and got a apexi s-avcr fitted

 

[antony@indigo-gt]

ah thats good then so i actually have 315bhp then

so with a pump and the dawes device fitted what do u think ill see with a re-map ant?

Depending on what other bit you have at say 1.6 bar I think 350-375bhp

 

[antony@indigo-gt]

mine has an hks hardpipe from turbo to hks mushroom filter,hks ssqv dump valve,dawes device(from urself):razz: and 3" exhaust but not de-catted oh and got a apexi s-avcr fitted

I think 315bhp sounds reasonable for that. With the filter it can lean the stock fueling off a bit and free up a good bit of power

 

[B6lee]

im not complaining, got what i wanted

 

[stevolution2010]

I think 315bhp sounds reasonable for that. With the filter it can lean the stock fueling off a bit and free up a good bit of power

you still rekon 360-375 on those mods now aswell

 

[antony@indigo-gt]

I would get a decat but yeah. You can get more but on a 6 engine I think it is wise not to go above 390bhp

 

[sponners]

Looking at a few graphs of the big power cars and the lower stuff and there is not a massive difference between the wheel figures but then the flywheel numbers are close to what you would expect.

I think across the entire day the figures they are fairly accurate so although perhaps the method seems strange the results pan out. Geof's car for instance is a 9 running 2 bar so it is about what you would expect and there was a 7 on the day. I think just a remap with 360bhp so again about what is expected.

cheers Ant, thats what seems weird though as you know the wheel horse power is the true...er of the two readings as this is where its measured.


.....gotta love rolling roads for the questions and head scratching they cause lol


and to think the mlr 24% transmission loss fudge factor is now laughed at by most over there as being too high.

 

[gooner8]

After reading above i think i was right to think i.ll get more bhp? Happy with the torque but thought i'd hit 300. Needs a map, but i.ll do that after rebuild. O and im i the only person who was told they didnt want to power test the car due to a funny noise coming from down near the pulley's. Lol ha there alway's one. Lol

 

[stevolution2010]

I would get a decat but yeah. You can get more but on a 6 engine I think it is wise not to go above 390bhp

ill just try for 375